Penetration testing at the speed of AI
Your software ships continuously. Your testing probably doesn’t. Mont puts AI agents on your estate and certified testers on the findings, so you get an audit-ready penetration test in about 24 hours, at a fraction of what one used to cost.
Attack path
4 findings, one route
Exposed admin panel
Web · no rate limiting on login
Credential reuse accepted
Identity · matched a known breach set
Session token replayed
API · MFA never re-challenged
Domain admin reached
Critical · full estate exposure
Illustrative: how four ordinary findings become one critical route.
Human-validated · Audit-ready · Aligned to OWASP · ISO 27001 · PCI-DSS
A traditional test is accurate on the day it lands and starts aging immediately. Between engagements you ship features, expose services, change permissions and add infrastructure. A posture that was clean in January can be open by June, and nobody finds out until the next report, or until someone else finds it first.
Testing once a year made sense when testing was slow and expensive. The introduction of AI changes that.
~24 hours
From engagement to results, where a traditional test takes weeks
Up to 5× cheaper
As little as a fifth of a traditional engagement, so testing can match your release cadence
Every release
Test when you ship rather than when the budget cycle allows
We agree the targets, the boundaries and the rules of engagement in writing before a single request is sent. Scope is enforced technically, not just promised in a document.
Reconnaissance, planning and exploitation run at machine speed, chaining findings into real attack paths rather than listing issues in isolation. Every action is logged as it happens.
Our testers confirm exploitability, discard the noise, and add the business context a machine cannot infer. This is the step that makes the output audit-grade rather than raw tool exhaust.
You get evidence, reproduction steps and prioritized remediation guidance, signed off by the tester. Once your team applies the fix, we retest and confirm the finding is genuinely closed.
Mont divides the work along a simple line. The AI does what it is genuinely better at, which is relentless coverage at machine speed. Our testers do what no model can, which is decide what actually matters and put their name on it.
That second half is not decoration. It is what separates a report you can hand to an auditor from a pile of tool output.
The AI does
Our testers do
Most penetration tests are sold on how much they find, as though a longer findings list were a better outcome. That made sense when finding was the expensive, difficult step. AI has made it fast and cheap. The bottleneck has moved.
What decides whether your risk actually falls is how quickly findings get fixed, and that is a people and process problem rather than a scanning one. A report nobody acts on leaves you exactly as exposed as you were the day before it arrived.
So we stay on. We prioritize what to tackle first, guide your engineers through each fix, answer the awkward questions that surface mid-remediation, and retest to confirm the finding is genuinely closed. Your team makes the changes, because your team owns the estate. Our job is making sure they are the right changes, in the right order. To be clear, that part is Unmewt around the product rather than a feature of the tool, and it is the reason clients keep us.
Mont finds and proves it
Hours, not weeks
A tester validates and prioritizes
What matters, in business terms
We guide your team to the fix
The step most providers skip
We retest and confirm it is closed
Proof, not an assumption
ISO 27001, PCI-DSS and the regional frameworks expect a scoped, documented penetration test carried out by qualified people. Mont meets that because a certified tester validates the findings and signs the report. The AI accelerates the work; it does not sign off on it.
We are deliberate about this line. Fully automated testing with no human in the loop does not satisfy those requirements, and any provider telling you otherwise is selling you a problem you will meet at audit time.
ISO 27001 PCI-DSS SOC 2 OJK MAS TRM OWASP
Anything that attacks your infrastructure should be constrained by design, not by trust.
Testing begins only against targets you have authorized in writing, with the rules of engagement agreed up front.
Boundaries are enforced technically. Mont does not wander outside the estate you defined, and everything it touches is on your list.
Destructive techniques are off by default. Where a test carries real risk, it is flagged for a decision instead of run quietly.
Findings and the evidence behind them are held in your region, under your privacy jurisdiction, rather than shipped offshore for processing.
Every action, every finding and every human decision is recorded, so you can reconstruct exactly what happened and when.
A named team stands behind the output. Questions get answered by the tester who signed the report, not a support queue.
Scope is agreed with you up front, and we would rather test less thoroughly agreed than more claimed. If something falls outside what Mont covers well today, our human-led penetration testing and red team work picks it up.
Web applications
Authenticated and unauthenticated testing across your web estate
Mobile
Android and iOS applications, including the APIs behind them
APIs
REST and GraphQL surfaces, authorization and business logic
Network & infrastructure
External and internal estate, hosts, services and configuration
Mont is built to run often and to run honestly. It does not pretend to be the whole picture, and we will tell you when you need the other kind of work.
Continuous
Fast, affordable, human-validated penetration testing you can run as often as you ship, so exposure surfaces in days rather than at the next annual engagement. Right for keeping pace with a moving estate, and for the testing your auditors expect each year.
Deep
Goal-based adversary simulation across people, process and physical access, testing whether you would detect and stop a determined attacker. That remains human work, and once the obvious gaps are closed it is where the real questions live.
ExploreYes, and safely is the default. Destructive techniques are disabled unless you explicitly ask for them, scope is enforced technically rather than by convention, and anything carrying real operational risk is flagged for your decision instead of being run quietly. Most clients start against staging, then move to production once they have seen how it behaves.
Nothing is tested without written authorization naming the targets and the rules of engagement. That protects both sides legally, and it is also why scope is enforced in the tooling rather than left to good intentions. If a target is not on the authorized list, Mont does not touch it.
It changes how the test is delivered rather than removing it. Mont is a penetration test where AI does the finding at machine speed and certified testers do the validation and sign-off. What it does not replace is a full red-team engagement, which tests your detection and response across people, process and physical access, and remains human-led work.
Yes, because it is human-in-the-loop. Those frameworks expect a scoped, documented penetration test performed by qualified people, which is exactly what you get: certified testers validate the findings and sign off the report. Fully automated testing with no human in the loop does not meet that bar, and we would not claim otherwise.
Findings and the evidence supporting them, held in your region under your privacy jurisdiction. We scope what is collected with you before testing starts, and the audit ledger records exactly what was accessed, so nothing about the engagement is opaque to you.
A certified tester reviews everything before it reaches you, so the report contains findings that were confirmed to be genuinely exploitable rather than everything a tool flagged. Removing the noise is a large part of what the human validation step is for.
Your team does, and we guide them to it. Finding issues is the part that has become fast and cheap; knowing what to change, in what order, without breaking something else is where most programs stall. We prioritize the findings, walk your engineers through the remediation, and retest to confirm each one is genuinely closed. We deliberately do not make changes inside your systems: your team owns its estate, and we make sure the changes it makes are the right ones.
Tell us what you want tested and we will scope it honestly, including whether Mont is the right fit or whether you need human-led work instead. Delivered under our ISO/IEC 27001:2022-certified ISMS.